Sanjog Dutta
Colonial capitalism had a significant influence, i.e.
the dutiful and hard-working ‘hill-man’ was morphed into an “accepted labor”,
through its mission of civilizing citizens. Like in the other places, the Darjeeling tea gardens
also bore productivity and business along with its tremendous magnificence,
facets that the European culture of colonial rule deemed very pivotal.
On one hand,
the discourse of the martial race was instrumental in having successfully
created the ʻGurkhaʼ regiments as a discipline for unceasing training of the
physique of the “Gurkha”. On the other hand, the ʻhill-manʼ slogging it out in the tea gardens was of a rival
domain, turning into hardworking laborers, under the strict regime of the
Imperial Botany.
A cultural
renaissance, Darjeeling
went under, resulted in the process of the Gurkha ʻidentityʼ formation. This process of
formation of a separate spirited cultural identity in the contours of the
“Indian Nepali” wasnʼt/hasnʼt been settled. Itʼs
relocation within the environ of a strong ”Indian” culture and identity has
contributed towards this instability. The problem of identity arose when this
“Indian” culture not only provided resources to define the Gurkha identity but
also mediated it.
The identity of
the Gurkha has always tread a difficult path where the flag- bearers of the
movement have put in a lot of effort to strike a fine balance between its
identity along with its demand for citizenship which would result in its
recognition as another “Indian” culture.
Everyday experiences and the
obligation to whittle a political and geographical space for its cultural rise
in India
has given rise to the problem of the Gurkha identity. They often claim
legitimacy by citing contributions to the anti-colonial struggle. However, this
claim is often reinforced by the historical links with Nepal , the
denial of history. Consequently, it has given rise to informal monikers like Bharatiya
Gorkhali or Bhargoli.
Itʼs been more than 103 years, the people of Darjeeling,
have been pressing their demand for self-rule, putting forward the argument
that they are distinct from the rest of the population of Bengal with reference
to history, ethnicity, language, culture, social and economic viabilities.
Against this backdrop Subhas Ghisingh launched the Gorkha National Liberation
Front on April 5th, 1980. From 1986-1988 he led a brutal movement for a
separate state, Gorkhaland, which resulted in 1200-odd deaths.
Post a Comment